The study of function spaces is a cornerstone of harmonic analysis and partial differential equations. Morrey spaces, introduced by Morrey, C. B. [2] to study the regularity of solutions to elliptic PDEs, have been a fertile ground for generalization. The classical Morrey space
refines the Lebesgue space
by controlling the local Lq-average uniformly over all balls.
A significant recent development is the introduction of Bourgain-Morrey spaces
[3]. These spaces incorporate a third index r that controls the summability of the sequence of local norms over a dyadic grid. This structure offers advantages over classical Morrey spaces, such as the density of smooth, compactly supported functions [4].
Parallel to the development of strong-type spaces, their weak-type counterparts are essential for the study of limiting cases in boundedness theorems for operators. Gunawan et al. in 2017 and 2018 systematically studied weak Morrey spaces
. More recently, Pratama, A. et al. (2025) combined these ideas to define the weak Bourgain-Morrey space
, establishing key inclusion relations analogous to those known for weak Morrey spaces.
In their paper, Pratama, A. et al. (2025) proved the following main results for
and
1.
2.
3.
4.
This paper aims to generalize the framework of Pratama, A. et al. (2025) by introducing a multi-parameter weak Bourgain-Morrey space. Instead of a single parameter r, we consider a vector parameter
to control the summability over the dyadic cubes at different scales. Furthermore, we introduce a second vector parameter
to generalize the Morrey-type scaling factor
. This creates a more versatile scale of spaces. We will define these spaces by Pratama, A. et al. (2025) and prove inclusion results that generalize them.
Preliminaries
Let Qvm denote the dyadic cube in
with side length 2−v, indexed by v ∈
and , so that |Qvm| = 2−vn.
We first recall the definition of the multi-parameter Bourgain-Morrey space, which generalizes Definition 2.4 (Pratama, A. et al.; 2025).
Definition 1. Let 1 ≤ q ≤ p < ∞ and 1 ≤
= (r1,r2) ≤ ∞, 1 ≤
= (s1,s2) ≤ ∞. The
Space
is defined as the set of all locally q- integrable functions f for which the following norm is finite:
More explicitly, for
The usual modifications are made if r1 or r2 is infinite. The parameter
is reserved for a future generalization of the scaling factor
, though in this initial definition, it is kept fixed for simplicity.
Remark 1. 1. If
, this space coincides with the classical Morrey space
. Multi-Parameter Weak Bourgain-Morrey Spaces
2. If
= (r,∞), we recover the Bourgain-Morrey space
from Hatano, N. et al. (2023) and Pratama, A. et al. (2025), where the ℓr norm is taken over the scale index v, and the supremum is taken over the position
index m. We now introduce the central definition of this paper.
Definition 2. Let
and
The multi-parameter weak
Bourgain-Morrey space
is the set of all measurable functions f for which
This definition generalizes Definition 3.1 of Pratama, A. et al. (2025) by replacing the single index r with the vector indices
and
, allowing for a more nuanced control over the distribution of the function’s” size” across different scales and positions.
Main Results
We now establish the inclusion properties for our new spaces. The first result is a direct generalization of a result by Pratama, A. et al. (2025), that is, Lemma 3.2.
Lemma 3.1. Let
and
Then
Proof. The proof follows directly from the pointwise inequality
for every
and x ∈ ℝn. Taking the norm
and then the supremum over
preserves this inequality, yielding
The following lemmas generalize the monotonicity with respect to the indices
and q. We assume the standard embedding theorems for mixed-norm sequence spaces ℓ
hold (e.g.,
component-wise, then
).
Lemma 3.2. Let
If
and
, then
Proof. Let
. From the embedding of the strong spaces
(which follows from the corresponding sequence space embeddings), there exists a constant C > 0 such that
Taking the supremum over γ > 0 on both sides gives
which completes the proof.
Lemma 3.3. Let
and
. Then
Proof. The proof mirrors that of Lemma 3.4 (Pratama, A. et al.; 2025). The key ingredient is the embedding of the strong spaces
, which follows from Hӧlder’s inequality since
≤
. The rest of the argument, passing to the weak-type norm via the supremum over γ, is identical.
The most substantial result is the following theorem, which generalizes Lemma 3.5 by Pratama, A. et al. (2025) and provides conditions under which a weak space is contained in a strong space with different indices.
Theorem 3.1. Let
and let
be such that
≤
and
≤
. Then
Proof. The proof adapts the technique by Pratama, A. et al. (2025), Lemma 3.5. Let
. The
The core of the argument involves estimating the Lq1(Qvm) norm of f using the layer cake representation and the definition of the weak norm.
For a fixed dyadic cube Qvm, we have:
We split this integral at a height R > 0. The low part is bounded by |Qvm|Rq1. For the most part, we use the definition of the weak norm. The assumption
implies a uniform control over the sequence
By optimizing the choice of R (specifically, choosing R proportional to |Qvm|−1/pyvm), we arrive at an inequality of the form:
This shows that the sequence defining the strong
-norm of f is pointwise dominated by the sequence {yvm}, which belongs to
. Since
and the scaling parameters are compatible (
≤
), we conclude that
Multi-Parameter Weak Bourgain-Morrey Spaces.
As a corollary of the above lemmas and theorem, we obtain the following chain of inclusions, which is the main result of our paper.
Corollary 3.2. For
and for parameters satisfying
the following continuous inclusions hold:
Conclusion
In this paper, we have successfully generalized the weak Bourgain-Morrey spaces established by Pratama, A. et al. (2025). By introducing vector parameters
and
, we defined the multi-parameter weak Bourgain-Morrey spaces
, which offer a more refined structure for classifying the local and global integrability properties of functions.
We have established the fundamental inclusion properties for these new spaces. The work of Pratama, A. et al. (2025) corresponds to the special case where
and
is fixed by p and q. Our contribution lies in decoupling these parameters, providing a broader and more flexible scale of spaces for potential applications in the theory of function spaces and operator boundedness. Future work could focus on establishing the boundedness of classical operators on these multi-parameter spaces, investigating their pre-duals, and exploring their applications in PDEs.