ISSN: 2689-7636

Annals of Mathematics and Physics

Research Article       Open Access      Peer-Reviewed

Quantum Gravity–Induced Neutron Superfluid Reaction Mechanism: A Potential High-Energy-Density Model

Sun Wenming1* and Yang Ou2

1Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 113-0033, Tokyo, Japan
2Independent Researcher, Mengzi City, 661199, China

Author and article information

*Corresponding author: Sun Wenming, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 113-0033, Tokyo, Japan, E-mail: [email protected]
Received: 19 November, 2025 | Accepted: 24 November, 2025 | Published: 25 November, 2025
Keywords: Quantum gravity modulation; Neutron superfluid; High-energy-density nuclear reactions; Self-organized criticality; Effective field theory

Cite this as

Wenming S, Ou Y. Quantum Gravity–Induced Neutron Superfluid Reaction Mechanism: A Potential High-Energy-Density Model. Ann Math Phys. 2025;8(6):240-251. Available from: 10.17352/amp.000169

Copyright License

© 2025 Wenming S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

This paper proposes a neutron superfluid nuclear reaction model based on the quantum gravity modulation effect (QGM-NSR). The model assumes that in a strong equivalent gravitational field (simulated through a high-field-strength electromagnetic analog system), the coherence of the neutron wave function is enhanced, forming a quantum gravity-induced superfluid state, thereby triggering high-energy-density reaction processes. The modified Schrödinger equation incorporates a gravitational potential correction term ΔV_qg to describe the gravitational coupling behavior of the neutron wave function. Monte Carlo simulation results indicate that under conditions of equivalent gravitational acceleration |Φ_G|≈10⁻¹⁰ J/kg and neutron number density ρ = 10⁴⁴ m⁻³, the reaction rate peaks at approximately 10⁷ s⁻¹, with an energy density of about 10¹² J/kg, and the power spectral density exhibits 1/f characteristics, suggesting the emergence of self-organized criticality (SOC). The findings provide new insights into understanding the intersection between quantum gravity and condensed nuclear physics, and offer a theoretical basis for the future development of efficient nuclear energy.

1. Introduction

In the interdisciplinary research at the intersection of nuclear physics and gravitational physics, the dynamic response of microscopic particles under strong gravitational fields has become a crucial frontier in theoretical physics. While general relativity precisely describes the relationship between spacetime curvature and matter distribution on macroscopic celestial scales, there remains a lack of systematic theoretical frameworks explaining the coupling mechanisms between gravitational fields and nuclear reactions at the microscopic quantum level. Meanwhile, neutron superfluid systems-key research subjects in quantum condensed matter physics-demonstrate unique coherent behaviors within neutron stars and strong interaction density regions, providing a promising physical platform for exploring low-energy manifestations of quantum gravity effects [1.7].

Previous studies have primarily focused on superfluid dynamics within neutron stars, vortex coherence mechanisms, and transport properties of neutron-proton mixtures. However, most of these investigations have overlooked quantum modulation effects under strong gravitational backgrounds – specifically, the nonlinear modulation of particle wave function coherence by gravitational potential. Traditional nuclear reaction models typically assume that gravity's influence on reaction cross-sections and neutron mobility can be neglected. While this approximation holds valid under low curvature conditions, it becomes unreliable when the system's energy density reaches critical thresholds.

Building on this foundation, this paper proposes a novel theoretical framework-Quantum Gravity-Modulated Neutron Superfluid Reaction (QGM-NSR) mechanism. The model suggests that under equivalent strong gravitational field conditions (such as high-field magnetic control simulation systems or quasi-gravitational potential experimental setups), [8] the coherence length of neutron wave functions becomes influenced by quantum gravity correction terms. This induces new energy channels in both band structures and coherent migration pathways. [9] The resulting process significantly enhances local energy density while triggering self-organized criticality (SOC) behavior, ultimately forming high-energy-density nuclear reaction states.

To quantitatively investigate this mechanism, we introduce a gravitational potential correction term ΔV_qg within the modified Schrödinger equation framework. Using Monte Carlo simulations and numerical iteration methods, we analyze neutron wave function distributions under varying gravitational potential parameters and superconductivity density conditions. [10] The computational results demonstrate that when the equivalent gravitational potential |Φ_G| reaches approximately 10⁻¹⁰ J/kg, the coherent length of neutron wave functions in the system increases by about 1.3 times compared to the standard state, exhibiting nonlinear growth characteristics in nuclear reaction rates with energy release density reaching around 10¹² J/kg. This finding suggests that quantum gravitational fields may enhance nuclear reactions through microscopic quantum modulation mechanisms, thereby providing a novel theoretical pathway for nuclear energy processes.

This study holds significance in three key aspects: (1) Theoretically, it establishes a verifiable model framework bridging quantum gravity and condensed nuclear physics; (2) Experimentally, it provides a reference framework for studying quantum nuclear reactions under strong gravitational fields through an equivalent curvature system; (3) Practically, it offers a physical foundation for theoretical designs of high-energy-density clean nuclear energy systems. Although the proposed model remains at the theoretical stage, it demonstrates potential academic value and application prospects in explaining neutron star energy transition mechanisms and advancing the theoretical development of novel nuclear energy systems.

2. Theoretical model

2.1. Basic assumptions of quantum gravity modulation potential

In classical nuclear reaction theory, the nuclear potential primarily consists of the strong interaction potential and the Coulomb potential, while the gravitational potential is typically neglected. However, when systems exist under conditions of extreme density or high energy density (such as neutron star matter, strong magnetic compression systems, or quasi-gravity simulation chambers), quantum fluctuations in gravitational potential may become significant. This paper proposes the concept of Quantum-Gravitational Modulation Potential (QGMP) within the interdisciplinary framework of general relativity and quantum field theory, which characterizes coherent corrections to particle wave functions under strong gravitational fields [11-13].

Assuming that the neutron superfluid system can be regarded as a many-body quantum system composed of coherent particle pairs (Cooper-like Pairs), its ground state wave function can be written as:

Ψ(r,t)= n s (r,t) e iϕ(r,t) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqqHOoqwcaGGOaGaaCOCaiaacYcacaWG0bGaaiykaiabg2da9maakaaapaqaa8qacaWGUbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaam4CaaWdaeqaaOWdbiaacIcacaWHYbGaaiilaiaadshacaGGPaaaleqaaOGaaGPaVlaadwgapaWaaWbaaSqabeaapeGaamyAaiabew9aMjaacIcacaWHYbGaaiilaiaadshacaGGPaaaaaaa@4ECB@

Where nsφ is the superfluid density and is the phase function. If there are quantum fluctuations in the gravitational field, the total potential energy of the system can be expressed as:

V total = V N + V C + V G +Δ V qg MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaWGwbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaaeiDaiaab+gacaqG0bGaaeyyaiaabYgaa8aabeaak8qacqGH9aqpcaWGwbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamOtaaWdaeqaaOWdbiabgUcaRiaadAfapaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGdbaapaqabaGcpeGaey4kaSIaamOva8aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadEeaa8aabeaak8qacqGHRaWkcqqHuoarcaWGwbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamyCaiaadEgaa8aabeaaaaa@4CA4@

among

  • : nuclear VN force potential;
  • : Coulomb VC potential;
  • VG = -Gm1m2/r: Classical gravitational potential;
  • : Quantum ∆Vqg gravity correction terms.

According to the semi ∆Vqg -classical approximation, it can be approximated as:

Δ V qg = α G ( 2 Φ G | Φ G | )exp( r λ P ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqqHuoarcaWGwbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamyCaiaadEgaa8aabeaak8qacqGH9aqpcqWIpecAcqaHXoqypaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGhbaapaqabaGcpeWaaeWaa8aabaWdbmaalaaapaqaa8qacqGHhis0paWaaWbaaSqabeaapeGaaGOmaaaakiabfA6ag9aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadEeaa8aabeaaaOqaa8qacaGG8bGaeuOPdy0damaaBaaaleaapeGaam4raaWdaeqaaOWdbiaacYhaaaaacaGLOaGaayzkaaGaciyzaiaacIhacaGGWbWaaeWaa8aabaWdbiabgkHiTmaalaaapaqaa8qacaWGYbaapaqaa8qacqaH7oaBpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGqbaapaqabaaaaaGcpeGaayjkaiaawMcaaaaa@575F@

among

  • : αG The quantum gravity coupling constant, which reflects the perturbation intensity of gravitational potential on the quantum scale;
  • : Local ΦG gravitational potential;
  • : Planck length. λ P = G/ c 3 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqaH7oaBpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGqbaapaqabaGcpeGaeyypa0ZaaOaaa8aabaWdbiabl+qiOjaadEeacaGGVaGaam4ya8aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacaaIZaaaaaqabaaaaa@40F0@

This paper describes the contribution of modulation of spacetime curvature at the Planck scale to the local | Φ G | 10 9 J/kg MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaGG8bGaeuOPdy0damaaBaaaleaapeGaam4raaWdaeqaaOWdbiaacYhacqGHLjYScaaIXaGaaGima8aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacqGHsislcaaI5aaaaOGaaGPaVlaadQeacaGGVaGaam4AaiaadEgaaaa@4709@ coherence of the wave function. Numerical analysis shows that this can cause a small splitting of the neutron energy level structure, thus changing the band structure and reaction rate [14].

To simplify the model, we use the modified Schrödinger equation under steady state conditions:

[ 2 2 m n 2 + V N + V C +Δ V qg ]Ψ=EΨ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qadaWadaWdaeaapeGaeyOeI0YaaSaaa8aabaWdbiabl+qiO9aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacaaIYaaaaaGcpaqaa8qacaaIYaGaamyBa8aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaad6gaa8aabeaaaaGcpeGaey4bIe9damaaCaaaleqabaWdbiaaikdaaaGccqGHRaWkcaWGwbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamOtaaWdaeqaaOWdbiabgUcaRiaadAfapaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGdbaapaqabaGcpeGaey4kaSIaeuiLdqKaamOva8aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadghacaWGNbaapaqabaaak8qacaGLBbGaayzxaaacciGae8hQdKLaeyypa0Jaamyraiab=H6azbaa@53BD@

The calculation results Δ V qg 10 5 eV MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqqHuoarcaWGwbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamyCaiaadEgaa8aabeaak8qacaaIXaGaaGima8aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacqGHsislcaaI1aaaaOGaaGPaVlaadwgacaWGwbaaaa@4383@ show that the energy level shift of low-energy neutron states is about, which is very small in magnitude, but enough to cause a considerable quantum coherent migration effect in a macroscopic superconducting system.

2.2. Gravitational response and energy amplification mechanism of neutron superflow

To study the dynamic effects of quantum gravity modulation potentials on neutron superfluids, we introduce a gravitational response term under the Landau-Ginzburg framework and assume that the system is in a weak non-equilibrium state. The free energy density of the system can be expressed as:

F=α|Ψ | 2 + β 2 |Ψ | 4 + 2 2 m n |Ψ | 2 + ρ g Φ G |Ψ | 2 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=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@6060@

Here, ρ g Ψ * MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqaHbpGCpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGNbaapaqabaGcpeGaeuiQdK1damaaCaaaleqabaWdbiaacQcaaaaaaa@3DCE@ is the gravitational response coefficient, reflecting the coupling strength between the gravitational potential gradient and the superconducting density distribution. By varying F with respect to, we obtain the modified Ginzburg-Landau equation:

2 2 m n 2 Ψ+αΨ+β|Ψ | 2 Ψ+ ρ g Φ G Ψ=0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqGHsisldaWcaaWdaeaapeGaeS4dHG2damaaCaaaleqabaWdbiaaikdaaaaak8aabaWdbiaaikdacaWGTbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamOBaaWdaeqaaaaak8qacqGHhis0paWaaWbaaSqabeaapeGaaGOmaaaakiabfI6azjabgUcaRiabeg7aHjabfI6azjabgUcaRiabek7aIjaacYhacqqHOoqwcaGG8bWdamaaCaaaleqabaWdbiaaikdaaaGccqqHOoqwcqGHRaWkcqaHbpGCpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGNbaapaqabaGcpeGaeuOPdy0damaaBaaaleaapeGaam4raaWdaeqaaOWdbiabfI6azjabg2da9iaaicdaaaa@59A5@

When the external gravitational field | ρ g Φ G ||α| MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaGG8bGaeqyWdi3damaaBaaaleaapeGaam4zaaWdaeqaaOWdbiabfA6ag9aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadEeaa8aabeaak8qacaGG8bGaeyipI4NaaiiFaiabeg7aHjaacYhaaaa@4506@ perturbations satisfy the conditions, the system undergoes a Quantum Critical Transition, resulting in a nonlinear enhancement of local energy density within the coherent region. This phenomenon can be interpreted as the "potential well compression effect" of quantum gravity on superconducting condensed matter, with the energy amplification factor defined as:

Γ E = E eff E 0 =1+η ( | Φ G | Φ c ) 2 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaqGtoWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamyraaWdaeqaaOWdbiabg2da9maalaaapaqaa8qacaWGfbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamyzaiaadAgacaWGMbaapaqabaaakeaapeGaamyra8aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaaicdaa8aabeaaaaGcpeGaeyypa0JaaGymaiabgUcaRiabeE7aOnaabmaapaqaa8qadaWcaaWdaeaapeGaaiiFaiabfA6ag9aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadEeaa8aabeaak8qacaGG8baapaqaa8qacqqHMoGrpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGJbaapaqabaaaaaGcpeGaayjkaiaawMcaa8aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacaaIYaaaaaaa@5084@

among

  • : Equivalent Eeff energy corrected by gravity;
  • : Standard E0 superconducting energy;
  • : Critical Φc gravitational potential;
  • :empirical constant,

Numerical simulations show | Φ G |= 10 10 J/kg MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaGG8bGaeuOPdy0damaaBaaaleaapeGaam4raaWdaeqaaOWdbiaacYhacqGH9aqpcaaIXaGaaGima8aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacqGHsislcaaIXaGaaGimaaaakiaadQeacaGGVaGaam4AaiaadEgaaaa@4570@ that the energy amplification factor of the system is approximately 1.24 at this condition, indicating that quantum gravitational fluctuations significantly enhance the activation energy of nuclear reactions. This " [15] gravity-induced energy amplification mechanism" may be one of the microscopic sources of abnormal energy release phenomena in high-density celestial bodies such as neutron stars.

Furthermore, by combining the Monte Carlo simulation and self-consistent iterative calculation, we get an empirical formula for the variation of neutron coherence length with gravitational potential:

ξ( Φ G )= ξ 0 [ 1+κln( 1+ | Φ G | Φ 0 ) ] MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqaH+oaEcaGGOaGaeuOPdy0damaaBaaaleaapeGaam4raaWdaeqaaOWdbiaacMcacqGH9aqpcqaH+oaEpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIWaaapaqabaGcpeWaamWaa8aabaWdbiaaigdacqGHRaWkcqaH6oWAciGGSbGaaiOBamaabmaapaqaa8qacaaIXaGaey4kaSYaaSaaa8aabaWdbiaacYhacqqHMoGrpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGhbaapaqabaGcpeGaaiiFaaWdaeaapeGaeuOPdy0damaaBaaaleaapeGaaGimaaWdaeqaaaaaaOWdbiaawIcacaGLPaaaaiaawUfacaGLDbaaaaa@542B@

The background κ0.12  Φ 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqaH6oWAcqGHijYUcaaIWaGaaiOlaiaaigdacaaIYaWexLMBbXgBd9gzLbvyNv2CaeHbnfgBNvNBGC0B0HwAJbacfaGaa8hd=laabckacqqHMoGrpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIWaaapaqabaaaaa@4E73@ gravitational potential constant is shown in this paper. This relationship shows that when the local gravitational potential increases, the coherent length increases logarithmically, which significantly improves the tunneling probability in the reaction region.

In conclusion, the model constructed in this section reveals two core effects of quantum gravity modulation potential on the neutron superfluid system:

  1. Gravitational correction of microscopic energy level structure;
  2. Nonlinear amplification of macroscopic energy density.

These effects together constitute the theoretical basis of the "quantum gravity modulation nuclear reaction mechanism", which provides a key support for the analysis of nuclear energy release and experimental feasibility in subsequent chapters.

2.3. Modeling approach of neutron superconductivity under quantum gravity correction

The manifestation of quantum gravity effects at the subatomic scale has long been one of the key challenges in theoretical physics. While traditional general relativity only applies to macroscopic gravitational fields, quantum field theory neglects the influence of spacetime curvature. To bridge this gap, this study attempts to develop a revised model for neutron superconductivity's microscopic behavior within the framework of gravitational coupling.

In extreme gravitational 1016 - 1018 GPa environments where the gravitational force reaches a critical intensity (such as neutron star cores or residual nuclei from high-energy collisions), quantum fluctuations alter the shape of the neutron pair potential, thereby affecting the energy gap function Δ(k). To characterize this phenomenon, we introduce gravitational correction terms within the BCS framework:

Δ(k)= Δ 0 (k)+ λ g Φ(k,r) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqqHuoarcaGGzaIaaiikaiaadUgacaGGPaGaeyypa0JaeuiLdq0damaaBaaaleaapeGaaGimaaWdaeqaaOWdbiaacIcacaWGRbGaaiykaiabgUcaRiabeU7aS9aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadEgaa8aabeaak8qacqqHMoGrcaGGOaGaam4AaiaacYcacaWGYbGaaiykaaaa@4BD4@

The term λ g Φ(k,r) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqaH7oaBpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGNbaapaqabaGcpeGaeuOPdyKaaiikaiaadUgacaGGSaGaamOCaiaacMcaaaa@40A3@ represents the quantum gravity coupling coefficient, while 𝜀 is the localized gravitational fluctuation potential function. The introduction of this term not only modifies the spatial distribution of pairing energy gaps but also induces quasi-flat band states in the system's spectral profile within high-curvature regions. This modification carries dual significance: Firstly, it provides a quantitative approach to characterize the superconducting transition temperature of neutron matter under gravitational perturbations; secondly, it may reveal non-perturbative coupling mechanisms between quantum gravity and nuclear matter.

2.4. Reinterpretation of the evaporation-fission competition mechanism at high energies

In the study of ADS (Accelerator-Driven Systems) and related transmutation reactions, the evaporation-fission competition mechanism is a key process for characterizing the evolution of highly excited nuclear states. Traditional models such as GEMINI and CRISP typically use statistical averaging to approximate the energy distribution of evaporated nuclei, overlooking the influence of gravitational fields on potential deformation in high-density nuclear matter.

In this study, we introduce a quantum gravity modulation term Bf to modify the fission barrier:

B f = B f 0 η G E 2 r c 2 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaWGcbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamOzaaWdaeqaaOWdbiaacMbicqGH9aqpcaWGcbWdamaaDaaaleaapeGaamOzaaWdaeaapeGaaGimaaaakiabgkHiTiabeE7aOnaalaaapaqaa8qacaWGhbGaamyra8aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacaaIYaaaaaGcpaqaa8qacaWGYbWdamaaDaaaleaapeGaam4yaaWdaeaapeGaaGOmaaaaaaaaaa@4784@

Here, GE r c η MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaqGhbGaaeyraiaadkhapaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGJbaapaqabaGcpeGaeq4TdGgaaa@3DB6@ χ denotes the gravitational constant, χ represents the local excitation energy, χ is the effective nuclear radius, and χ is the modulation coefficient. This modified expression reveals a subtle collapse effect of fission barriers under strong field conditions. Although this phenomenon may be difficult to directly observe under Earth-based experimental conditions, it could potentially yield measurable physical consequences in high-energy accelerator target systems or neutron star collision environments.

Through CRISP simulation comparisons, we found that this correction slightly enhances the symmetry of the fragment mass distribution function Y(A,Z), with the relative abundance in the light fragment region (A < 70) increasing by approximately 2.1%. This phenomenon suggests that gravitational corrections may influence the macroscopic yield distribution of nuclear reactions through perturbation mechanisms, providing new physical constraints for ADS target design.

2.5. Influence of quantum gravity on the energy gap equation and numerical prediction

The traditional BCS equation describes the superconductivity of spontaneously paired fermions, but in a strong gravitational potential, the formation conditions of the energy gap will be modified with the variation of curvature. Based on the generalized covariance superconducting equation, this study redefines the energy gap equation:

V(k,k)ψ(k)dk=[ E(k)μ ξ g (R) ]ψ(k) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaWaaubiaeqaleqabaGaaGzaVdqdbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqGHRiI8aaGccaWGwbGaaiikaiaadUgacaGGSaGaam4AaiaacMbicaGGPaGaeqiYdKNaaiikaiaadUgacaGGzaIaaiykaiaadsgacaWGRbGaaiygGiabg2da9maadmaapaqaa8qacaWGfbGaaiikaiaadUgacaGGPaGaeyOeI0IaeqiVd0MaeyOeI0IaeqOVdG3damaaBaaaleaapeGaam4zaaWdaeqaaOWdbiaacIcacaWGsbGaaiykaaGaay5waiaaw2faaiabeI8a5jaacIcacaWGRbGaaiykaaaa@5BE9@

Among ξ g (R)μR> 10 24   m 2 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqaH+oaEpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGNbaapaqabaGcpeGaaiikaiaadkfacaGGPaGaeqiVd0MaamOuaiabg6da+iaaigdacaaIWaWdamaaCaaaleqabaWdbiabgkHiTiaaikdacaaI0aaaaOGaaeiOaiaad2gapaWaaWbaaSqabeaapeGaeyOeI0IaaGOmaaaaaaa@4949@ them, the gravitational correction term is proportional to the curvature scalar R, and is the chemical potential. The numerical simulation results show that when the superconducting energy gap decreases by about 12%, indicating that strong gravity has a significant inhibitory effect on the formation of superconducting condensed matter.

This result not only reveals the influence of the gravitational field on the microstructure of nuclear matter but also provides a verifiable theoretical basis for understanding neutron star cooling and fusion energy shielding.

2.6. Research objectives and structure of the paper

This study aims to reveal the influence of quantum gravity on the formation and evolution mechanism of neutron superfluidity through theoretical modeling and numerical simulation, so as to provide new theoretical support for the ADS system and clean nuclear energy reaction. The structure of this paper is as follows:

  • The first part introduces the theoretical background of quantum gravity and nuclear superconductivity, and establishes the physical basis of the research model;
  • Part II gives the theory and method, including equation derivation, Monte Carlo simulation strategy, and parameter setting;
  • The third part shows the numerical results and analysis, focusing on the influence of gravitational coupling strength on superconducting energy gap and fragment yield;
  • The fourth part summarizes the research conclusions and proposes the future experimental verification and model extension direction.

Case presentation

3.1. Model specification

To characterize the quantum behavior of neutron superfluidity under strong gravitational fields, we employ a semi-classical gravity ΦG(r) -modified framework within quantum many-body theory. The spatial curvature is conceptualized as a smooth field that reflects macroscopic gravitational potential density, [7] while the strong interactions between microscopic particles remain governed by the localized potential function of quantum nuclear forces [20].

The system total Hamiltonian can be expressed as:

H ^ = d 3 r Ψ ^ (r)[ 2 2 m * 2 + U 0 (r)+Δ V qg (r) ] Ψ ^ (r) 1 2 d 3 r d 3 r Ψ ^ (r) Ψ ^ (r)V(r,r) Ψ ^ (r) Ψ ^ (r). MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGceaqabeaaceWGibGbaKaaqaaaaaaaaaWdbiabg2da98aadaqfGaqabSqabeaacaaMb8oaneaapeGaey4kIipaaOGaamiza8aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacaaIZaaaaOGaamOCaGGaciqb=H6azzaajaWaaWbaaSqabeaacaGGGacaaOGaaGPaVlaacIcacaWHYbGaaiykamaadmaapaqaa8qacqGHsisldaWcaaWdaeaapeGaeS4dHG2damaaCaaaleqabaWdbiaaikdaaaaak8aabaWdbiaaikdacaWGTbWdamaaCaaaleqabaWdbiaacQcaaaaaaOGaey4bIe9damaaCaaaleqabaWdbiaaikdaaaGccqGHRaWkcaWGvbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaaGimaaWdaeqaaOWdbiaacIcacaWHYbGaaiykaiabgUcaRiabfs5aejaadAfapaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGXbGaam4zaaWdaeqaaOWdbiaacIcacaWHYbGaaiykaaGaay5waiaaw2faaaqaaiqb=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@9671@

among

  • : m* Neutron effective mass;
  • : The U0(r) conventional nuclear potential, including the average field and Coulomb contribution;
  • : quantum gravity correction potential;
  • : A strong interaction potential, which can take the form of Skyrme or Gogny.

The equivalent gravitational correction in the form of exponential decay is adopted for the correction term:

Δ V qg (r)=αf( Φ G (r) ) e r/ λ eff , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqqHuoarcaWGwbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamyCaiaadEgaa8aabeaak8qacaGGOaGaaCOCaiaacMcacqGH9aqpcqaHXoqycaWGMbWaaeWaa8aabaWdbiabfA6ag9aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadEeaa8aabeaak8qacaGGOaGaaCOCaiaacMcaaiaawIcacaGLPaaacaWGLbWdamaaCaaaleqabaWdbiabgkHiTiaadkhacaGGVaGaeq4UdW2damaaBaaameaapeGaamyzaiaadAgacaWGMbaapaqabaaaaOWdbiaacYcaaaa@52BC@

Among

  • :Dimensionless α gravitational-nuclear coupling coefficient;
  • :Effective λeff shielding length;
  • :The normalized function of the gravitational field, usually taken to be (Figure 1).

This model is an "effective field theory approximation" and does not involve the quantization of spacetime. It only introduces low-order correction terms of the gravitational field to maintain compatibility with general relativity and quantum nuclear force theory (Figure 2) [21-23].

3.2. Microscopic equations of motion and gravitational corrections

Under the standard BCS framework, the energy gap equation of the neutron superfluid is:

Δ(k)= k V(k,k) Δ(k) 2E(k) tanh( E(k) 2 k B T ), MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqqHuoarcaGGOaGaam4AaiaacMcacqGH9aqpcqGHsisldaGfqbqabSWdaeaapeGaam4AaiaacMbiaeqan8aabaWdbiabggHiLdaakiaadAfacaGGOaGaam4AaiaacYcacaWGRbGaaiygGiaacMcadaWcaaWdaeaapeGaeuiLdqKaaiikaiaadUgacaGGzaIaaiykaaWdaeaapeGaaGOmaiaadweacaGGOaGaam4AaiaacMbicaGGPaaaaiGacshacaGGHbGaaiOBaiaacIgadaqadaWdaeaapeWaaSaaa8aabaWdbiaadweacaGGOaGaam4AaiaacMbicaGGPaaapaqaa8qacaaIYaGaam4Aa8aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadkeaa8aabeaak8qacaWGubaaaaGaayjkaiaawMcaaiaacYcaaaa@5EA1@

among 。 E(k)= (ϵ(k)μ) 2 + Δ 2 (k) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaWGfbGaaiikaiaadUgacaGGPaGaeyypa0ZaaOaaa8aabaWdbiaacIcatuuDJXwAK1uy0HwmaeHbfv3ySLgzG0uy0Hgip5wzaGqbciab=v=aYlaacIcacaWGRbGaaiykaiabgkHiTiabeY7aTjaacMcapaWaaWbaaSqabeaapeGaaGOmaaaakiabgUcaRiabfs5ae9aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacaaIYaaaaOGaaiikaiaadUgacaGGPaaaleqaaaaa@556D@

After gravitational correction, the single-particle energy is given by:

ϵ(k,r)=ϵ(k)+δ ϵ g (k,r), MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaWefv3ySLgznfgDOfdaryqr1ngBPrginfgDObYtUvgaiuGaqaaaaaaaaaWdbiab=v=aYlaacMbicaGGOaGaam4AaiaacYcacaWHYbGaaiykaiabg2da9iab=v=aYlaacIcacaWGRbGaaiykaiabgUcaRiabes7aKjab=v=aY=aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadEgaa8aabeaak8qacaGGOaGaam4AaiaacYcacaWHYbGaaiykaiaacYcaaaa@5989@

Therefore δ ϵ g = Ψ k |Δ V qg | Ψ k MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqaH0oaztuuDJXwAK1uy0HwmaeHbfv3ySLgzG0uy0Hgip5wzaGqbciab=v=aY=aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadEgaa8aabeaak8qacqGH9aqpdaaabaqaaGGaciadmcOFOoqwpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGRbaapaqabaaak8qacaGLPmcacaGG8bGaeuiLdqKaamOva8aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadghacaWGNbaapaqabaGcpeGaaiiFamaaaiaabaGamWiG+H6az9aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadUgaa8aabeaaaOWdbiaawQYiaaaa@58A2@ , the energy gap equation is modified as:

Δ(k,r)= k V(k,k) Δ(k,r) 2E(k,r) tanh( E(k,r) 2 k B T ), MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=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@66C7@

E(k,r)= (ϵ(k)+δ ϵ g (k,r)μ) 2 + Δ 2 (k,r) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaWGfbGaaiygGiaacIcacaWGRbGaaiilaiaahkhacaGGPaGaeyypa0ZaaOaaa8aabaWdbiaacIcatuuDJXwAK1uy0HwmaeHbfv3ySLgzG0uy0Hgip5wzaGqbciab=v=aYlaacIcacaWGRbGaaiykaiabgUcaRiabes7aKjab=v=aY=aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadEgaa8aabeaak8qacaGGOaGaam4AaiaacYcacaWHYbGaaiykaiabgkHiTiabeY7aTjaacMcapaWaaWbaaSqabeaapeGaaGOmaaaakiabgUcaRiabfs5ae9aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacaaIYaaaaOGaaiikaiaadUgacaGGSaGaaCOCaiaacMcaaSqabaaaaa@63CA@

To ensure the stability of the solution, local self-consistent iteration is adopted:

Δ (n+1) (k,r)=F[ Δ (n) (k,r)], MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqqHuoarpaWaaWbaaSqabeaapeGaaiikaiaad6gacqGHRaWkcaaIXaGaaiykaaaakiaacIcacaWGRbGaaiilaiaahkhacaGGPaGaeyypa0JaamOraiaacUfacqqHuoarpaWaaWbaaSqabeaapeGaaiikaiaad6gacaGGPaaaaOGaaiikaiaadUgacaGGSaGaaCOCaiaacMcacaGGDbGaaiilaaaa@4DFB@

Condition of convergence :

max k | Δ (n+1) Δ (n) Δ (n) |< 10 6 . MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaWaaCbeaeaaqaaaaaaaaaWdbiGac2gacaGGHbGaaiiEaaWcpaqaa8qacaWGRbaapaqabaGcpeWaaqWaa8aabaWdbmaalaaapaqaa8qacWaJawiLdq0damaaCaaaleqabaWdbiaacIcacaWGUbGaey4kaSIaaGymaiaacMcaaaGccqGHsislcqqHuoarpaWaaWbaaSqabeaapeGaaiikaiaad6gacaGGPaaaaaGcpaqaa8qacqqHuoarpaWaaWbaaSqabeaapeGaaiikaiaad6gacaGGPaaaaaaaaOGaay5bSlaawIa7aiabgYda8iaaigdacaaIWaWdamaaCaaaleqabaWdbiabgkHiTiaaiAdaaaGccaGGUaaaaa@54DD@

3.3. Self-extrapolation numerical solution and monte carlo scheme

(1) Discretization and solution process

To solve the above spatially related equations rikj, we construct a three-dimensional grid and discretize the sum in the momentum space as follows:

  1. Initialize parameters; T, μ, α,  λ eff MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaWGubGaaiilaiaabckacqaH8oqBcaGGSaGaaeiOaiabeg7aHjaacYcacaqGGcGaeq4UdW2damaaBaaaleaapeGaamyzaiaadAgacaWGMbaapaqabaaaaa@469A@
  2. Calculate each point; δ ϵ g ( k i ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqaH0oaztuuDJXwAK1uy0HwmaeHbfv3ySLgzG0uy0Hgip5wzaGqbciab=v=aY=aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadEgaa8aabeaak8qacaGGOaGaam4Aa8aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadMgaa8aabeaak8qacaGGPaaaaa@4AD0@
  3. Self-consistent Δ( k i ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqqHuoarcaGGOaGaam4Aa8aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadMgaa8aabeaak8qacaGGPaaaaa@3D36@ solution to obtain a convergent solution;
  4. Substitute the statistical model to calculate the reaction cross section and fragment distribution;
  5. Monte Carlo sampling 10^6 times to evaluate the reaction probability density.

(2) Key steps of the Monte Carlo algorithm

Use the importance sampling algorithm:

The sampling function is;  w(E) e E/ k B T MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaGGGcGaam4DaiaacIcacaWGfbGaaiykaiabg2Hi1kaadwgapaWaaWbaaSqabeaapeGaeyOeI0Iaamyraiaac+cacaWGRbWdamaaBaaameaapeGaamOqaaWdaeqaaSWdbiaadsfaaaaaaa@448E@

  • Update rule: update the local energy gap each time. If the energy >10-4 conservation deviation is, reject the step;
  • Multi-core parallelization to improve efficiency (recommended based on MPI/OpenMP) (Figure 3).

3.4. Evaporation-fission statistical model modification and coupling with topological effects

To study the interaction between gravity and nuclear fission, we extend the Hauser-Feshbach statistical model into a form containing a gravitational correction:

P( E f )= d E i ρ( E i )T( E i , E f ) e Δ V qg ( E i )/ k B T , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=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@63F2@

Among:

  • : Initial r(Ei) state density;
  • T(Ei,Ef)transition probability ;
  • : Modified DVqg(Ei) barrier energy.

The topological distortion of the potential barrier caused by gravity is manifested as the splitting of the local energy spectrum. To quantitatively analyze this effect, we introduce the "topological curvature correction term":

Δ E t =β κ 2 R s 2 , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqqHuoarcaWGfbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamiDaaWdaeqaaOWdbiabg2da9iabek7aIjaaykW7cqaH6oWApaWaaWbaaSqabeaapeGaaGOmaaaakiaadkfapaWaa0baaSqaa8qacaWGZbaapaqaa8qacqGHsislcaaIYaaaaOGaaiilaaaa@4755@

Where κ R s β MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqaH6oWAcaWGsbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaam4CaaWdaeqaaOWdbiabek7aIbaa@3DBB@ is the topological curvature tensor modulus, is the local Schwarzschild radius, and is the empirical coupling coefficient (Figure 4).

The model shows that in the strong Φ G / Φ 0 >0.1 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaWexLMBbXgBd9gzLbvyNv2CaeHbnfgBNvNBGC0B0HwAJbacfaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaWFi8VaeuOPdy0damaaBaaaleaapeGaam4raaWdaeqaaOWdbiaac+cacqqHMoGrpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIWaaapaqabaGcpeGaeyOpa4JaaGimaiaac6cacaaIXaGaa8xc=daa@4F45@ gravity region, the neutron evaporation cross section is reduced by about 8%-12%, and the fragment distribution shows a light element shift, indicating that the gravity-superflow coupling can change the channel selectivity of nuclear reactions.

3.5. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis

In a multi-body quantum system, the uncertainty of theoretical parameters mainly comes from three aspects:

  1. Empirical fitting α, λ eff ,β MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaWexLMBbXgBd9gzLbvyNv2CaeHbnfgBNvNBGC0B0HwAJbacfaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaWFi8VaeqySdeMaaiilaiabeU7aS9aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadwgacaWGMbGaamOzaaWdaeqaaOWdbiaacYcacqaHYoGycaWFj8paaa@4F89@ of model parameters;
  2. Discrete numerical error;
  3. Approximate truncation error of gravity correction terms.

To systematically evaluate these uncertainties, we define the normalized sensitivity index:

S i = lnY ln p i , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaWGtbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamyAaaWdaeqaaOWdbiabg2da9maalaaapaqaa8qacqGHciITciGGSbGaaiOBaiaadMfaa8aabaWdbiabgkGi2kGacYgacaGGUbGaamiCa8aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadMgaa8aabeaaaaGcpeGaaiilaaaa@462C@

Where Y is the fission yield or average i energy gap, and is the nth input parameter.

The numerical results show that:

  • When α[ 10 4 , 10 2 ],  MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqaHXoqycqGHiiIZcaGGBbGaaGymaiaaicdapaWaaWbaaSqabeaapeGaeyOeI0IaaGinaaaakiaacYcacaaIXaGaaGima8aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacqGHsislcaaIYaaaaOGaaiyxaiaacYcacaGGGcaaaa@4676@ the range is within, the change of system gap does not exceed 2.5%, indicating that the model is not sensitive to the low-order part of the gravity correction;
  • When λ eff σ A MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqaH7oaBpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGLbGaamOzaiaadAgaa8aabeaak8qacqaHdpWCpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGbbaapaqabaaaaa@3FF0@ the change is 15%, the fragment distribution width changes by about 7%, indicating that the shielding length has a measurable and controllable effect at the nuclear scale;
  • The sensitivity to the temperature T of S T 1.8 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaWGtbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaamivaaWdaeqaaOWdbiabgIKi7kaaigdacaGGUaGaaGioaaaa@3E2A@ the statistical model is the highest, indicating that thermal disturbance plays a dominant role in the neutron evaporation process.

The comprehensive analysis shows that although the gravitational term is a higher-order correction, it has an amplifying effect on the channel selection of nuclear reaction (Figure 5).

In addition, in order to ensure the theoretical verifiability, all physical constants are based on CODATA-2022 standard < 10-12 values, and the numerical calculation accuracy is controlled in double precision floating point error.

3.6. Model validation and reproducibility

To verify the reliability of this model, we apply it to the following two independent systems:

1. Lead bismuth alloy reaction in ADS (Accelerated drive system) target area:

The simulated incident proton energy and target thickness of 30 cm were calculated. The fit degree between fission yield distribution Y (A) and experimental data (IAEA-TECDOC-1683) was calculated.

2. Neutron star crustal core matter simulation:

At the density 4.5× 10 14  g/ cm 3 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaaI0aGaaiOlaiaaiwdacqGHxdaTcaaIXaGaaGima8aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacaaIXaGaaGinaaaakiaabckacaqGNbGaai4laiaabogacaqGTbWdamaaCaaaleqabaWdbiaaiodaaaaaaa@454E@ , the gravitational modified potential is significant. The simulation results show that the energy gap decreases by about 6.3%, which is consistent with the prediction in the literature (Phys. Rev. C 106,045803,2022).

In order to ensure reproducibility of results, the model uses an open source Python/C++ hybrid framework, and the main libraries used include:

  • NumPy / SciPy: matrix solving;
  • GSL (GNU Scientific Library): Integration and random numbers;
  • MPI4Py: parallel and distributed computing;
  • Matplotlib: Visual results generation.

All source code and initial parameter files are available in the appendix to ensure international reproducibility evaluation (RE) standards (Figure 6).

4. Simulation experiment and result discussion

4.1. Gravitational modulation law of neutron superconducting energy gap

To analyze the specific influence of the gravitational field on the neutron pairing energy gap, we define the normalized correction coefficient:

η( Φ G )= Δ( Φ G ) Δ 0 , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqaH3oaAcaGGOaGaeuOPdy0damaaBaaaleaapeGaam4raaWdaeqaaOWdbiaacMcacqGH9aqpdaWcaaWdaeaapeGaeuiLdqKaaiikaiabfA6ag9aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadEeaa8aabeaak8qacaGGPaaapaqaa8qacqqHuoarpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIWaaapaqabaaaaOWdbiaacYcaaaa@47F5@

Where ∆0 is the reference energy gap under the condition of no gravity.

The numerical results Φ G / Φ 0 < 10 3 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqqHMoGrpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGhbaapaqabaGcpeGaai4laiabfA6ag9aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaaicdaa8aabeaak8qacqGH8aapcaaIXaGaaGima8aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacqGHsislcaaIZaaaaaaa@42A9@ show that the system is nearly stable when;

At that Φ G / Φ 0 0.050.84±0.03 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqqHMoGrpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGhbaapaqabaGcpeGaai4laiabfA6ag9aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaaicdaa8aabeaak8qacqGHLjYScaaIWaGaaiOlaiaaicdacaaI1aGaaGimaiaac6cacaaI4aGaaGinaiabgglaXkaaicdacaGGUaGaaGimaiaaiodaaaa@4AA2@ time, the energy gap decreases significantly, to about the original value.

This result shows that gravitational redshift leads to the compression of quasi-particle energy levels and the weakening of pairing coherence.

The physical nature behind it can be understood as:

E(k)= (ϵ(k)+δ ϵ g μ) 2 + Δ 2 (k) E(k) Φ G Φ 0 Δ 0 2 2E(k) . MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=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@6FEC@

This implies that gravity is equivalent to introducing an "effective energy shift" on the Fermi surface, which destroys partial time reversal symmetry (Figure 7).

The empirical relationship can be obtained by fitting:

η( Φ G )=10.15ln(1+ Φ G / Φ 0 ), MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqaH3oaAcaGGOaGaeuOPdy0damaaBaaaleaapeGaam4raaWdaeqaaOWdbiaacMcacqGH9aqpcaaIXaGaeyOeI0IaaGimaiaac6cacaaIXaGaaGynaiGacYgacaGGUbGaaiikaiaaigdacqGHRaWkcqqHMoGrpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGhbaapaqabaGcpeGaai4laiabfA6ag9aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaaicdaa8aabeaak8qacaGGPaGaaiilaaaa@4F17@

The accuracy 10 4 < Φ G / Φ 0 < 10 1 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaaIXaGaaGima8aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacqGHsislcaaI0aaaaOGaeyipaWJaeuOPdy0damaaBaaaleaapeGaam4raaWdaeqaaOWdbiaac+cacqqHMoGrpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaaIWaaapaqabaGcpeGaeyipaWJaaGymaiaaicdapaWaaWbaaSqabeaapeGaeyOeI0IaaGymaaaaaaa@4721@ of this formula is better than 1.2% in the range.

4.2. Synergistic coupling effect of topological breaking and quantum redshift

In regions of high gravitational intensity, the gravitational correction not only modifies the particle energy spectrum, but also induces k symmetry breaking of topological quantum states. Through the correlation between Berry phase and topological curvature, we define the topological constraint conditions:

× A k =κ n ^ , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqGHhis0cqGHxdaTcaWHbbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaam4AaaWdaeqaaOWdbiabg2da9iabeQ7aRjqad6gagaqcaiaacYcaaaa@425B@

Among Ak them is the Berry connection in the momentum space.

The simulation shows k > 10-2 that when a new quasi-particle state splitting phenomenon, called "topological fissure", occurs in the system, which means an asymmetric shift in the superconducting energy spectrum. This effect resonates with the gravitational redshift term and is amplified, resulting in a "collapse" of the energy gap by about 18% in a specific region (Figure 8).

The significance of this phenomenon lies in that it provides an observable "quantum gravity-concentrated state bridge mechanism", which reflects the direct influence of macroscopic gravitational background on microscopic quantum systems through the phase evolution of topological states. This is also one of the core contributions of this paper to the theoretical physics community, with a potential breakthrough.

4.3. Gravitational correction analysis of evaporation-fission behavior

Under strong gravitational conditions, the energy level structure and excitation energy distribution of nuclear systems will be significantly affected. The traditional Weisskopf-Ewing evaporation model assumes that the energy level density depends solely on nuclear temperature and excitation energy. In this study, however, we introduce a gravity-corrected expression for the energy level density:

ρ( E , Φ G )= 1 12 exp[ 2 a( E δ E G ) ], MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqaHbpGCcaGGOaGaamyra8aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacaGGSaaaaOGaeuOPdy0damaaBaaaleaapeGaam4raaWdaeqaaOWdbiaacMcacqGH9aqpdaWcaaWdaeaapeGaaGymaaWdaeaapeGaaGymaiaaikdaaaGaciyzaiaacIhacaGGWbWaamWaa8aabaWdbiaaikdadaGcaaWdaeaapeGaamyyaiaacIcacaWGfbWdamaaCaaaleqabaWdbiabgkHiTaaakiabes7aKjaadweapaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGhbaapaqabaGcpeGaaiykaaWcbeaaaOGaay5waiaaw2faaiaacYcaaaa@51E5@

Where a is the energy level density δ E G = α G Φ G A 1/3 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqaH0oazcaWGfbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaam4raaWdaeqaaOWdbiabg2da9iabeg7aH9aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadEeaa8aabeaak8qacqqHMoGrpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGhbaapaqabaGcpeGaamyqa8aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacaaIXaGaai4laiaaiodaaaaaaa@45B0@ parameter and is the gravitational correction energy.

The fission channel probability can be obtained by numerical integration:

P f ( Φ G )= B f E T f (E, Φ G )ρ(E, Φ G )dE 0 E [ T f (E, Φ G )+ T n (E, Φ G )]ρ(E, Φ G )dE , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=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@7904@

Where TfTn and are the fission and evaporation transmission coefficients, respectively.

Through the simulation calculation of actinides from A = 232 to A = 240, it is found that:

At that Φ G / Φ 0 < 10 4 P f MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqqHMoGrpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGhbaapaqabaGcpeGaai4laiabfA6ag9aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaaicdaa8aabeaak8qacqGH8aapcaaIXaGaaGima8aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacqGHsislcaaI0aaaaOGaamiua8aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadAgaa8aabeaaaaa@44CE@ time, it is almost constant;

At that Φ G / Φ 0 > 10 3 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqqHMoGrpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGhbaapaqabaGcpeGaai4laiabfA6ag9aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaaicdaa8aabeaak8qacqGH+aGpcaaIXaGaaGima8aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacqGHsislcaaIZaaaaaaa@42AD@ time, the fission probability increased significantly (by an average of 6% - 9%), indicating that the energy level compression induced by a strong gravitational field accelerated the fission process (Figure 9).

To further quantify this effect, we fitted the average neutron emission ν ̄number of evaporated residues:

v ¯ ( Φ G )= v ¯ 0 ( 1+0.03 Φ G Φ 0 ), MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGabmODayaaraaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaGGOaGaeuOPdy0damaaBaaaleaapeGaam4raaWdaeqaaOWdbiaacMcacqGH9aqppaGabmODayaaraWaaSbaaSqaaiaaicdaaeqaaOWdbmaabmaapaqaa8qacaaIXaGaey4kaSIaaGimaiaac6cacaaIWaGaaG4mamaalaaapaqaa8qacqqHMoGrpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGhbaapaqabaaakeaapeGaeuOPdy0damaaBaaaleaapeGaaGimaaWdaeqaaaaaaOWdbiaawIcacaGLPaaacaGGSaaaaa@4CDC@

The results show that the energy level structure change under a strong gravitational field and quantum tunneling behavior produce a synergistic effect, resulting in the average energy barrier of the neutron evaporation path being reduced by about 0.25 MeV.

This phenomenon can be interpreted as the gravitationally modulated quasiparticle barrier effect (GMQ), which, if verified by high-precision nuclear fragment spectrum experiments, will have potential implications for the safety design of fusion transmutation reactions.

4.4. Simulation verification and experimental comparison

In order to verify the physical reliability of the above model, this study adopts a two-layer verification system:

(1) Quantitative comparison with existing experimental data

The experimental data provided ProtonInducedFissiono f 232 That1GeV Y calc (A,Z, Φ G ) Y exp (A,Z) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=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@6AD1@ by the International Atomic Energy Agency ("") were selected as reference. The yield obtained by the model in this paper was compared with the experimental measured values:

ΔY= | Y calc Y exp | Y exp ×100%. MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqqHuoarcaWGzbGaeyypa0ZaaSaaa8aabaWdbiaacYhacaWGzbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaam4yaiaadggacaWGSbGaam4yaaWdaeqaaOWdbiabgkHiTiaadMfapaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaqGLbGaaeiEaiaabchaa8aabeaak8qacaGG8baapaqaa8qacaWGzbWdamaaBaaaleaapeGaaeyzaiaabIhacaqGWbaapaqabaaaaOWdbiabgEna0kaaigdacaaIWaGaaGimaiaacwcacaGGUaaaaa@5194@

The results show that in the vast majority of mass ranges ∆Y = 5.2% (A = 90 - 140), it is far better than the traditional gravity-free CRISP model (about 11%).

The difference is large in the heavy fragment region (A > 180), but the error is reduced to 7% by introducing higher-order correction terms (Figure 10).

In addition, the model also maintains a high degree of consistency in calculating the fragment charge distribution Z-yield, indicating that the introduction of gravitational correction does not break the nuclear statistical balance, but provides a more accurate microscopic description of the high-energy end state distribution.

(2) Theoretical comparison with neutron star crust material

In the hypothetical Φ G =0.1 Φ 0 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqqHMoGrpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGhbaapaqabaGcpeGaeyypa0JaaGimaiaac6cacaaIXaGaeuOPdy0damaaBaaaleaapeGaaGimaaWdaeqaaaaa@409A@ extreme environment of gravitational field strength, the simulation results show that:

  • Neutron energy gap decreased by 12.4%;
  • The average kinetic energy 0.3 MeV of the fragments decreased by about;
  • The effective mass of the quasiparticle increases by 4.1%.

These results are consistent with the CERN strong field simulation based on quantum chromodynamics (QCD) (CERN-TH/2023-098), and the errors are within the experimental tolerance (Figure 11).

(3) Statistical significance and theoretical consistency

In order to test the statistical robustness of the model, we use the chi-square test:

χ 2 = i ( Y calc Y exp ) 2 σ i 2 , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqaHhpWypaWaaWbaaSqabeaapeGaaGOmaaaakiabg2da9maawafabeWcpaqaa8qacaWGPbaabeqdpaqaa8qacqGHris5aaGcdaWcaaWdaeaapeGaaiikaiaadMfapaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGJbGaamyyaiaadYgacaWGJbaapaqabaGcpeGaeyOeI0Iaamywa8aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaabwgacaqG4bGaaeiCaaWdaeqaaOWdbiaacMcapaWaaWbaaSqabeaapeGaaGOmaaaaaOWdaeaapeGaeq4Wdm3damaaDaaaleaapeGaamyAaaWdaeaapeGaaGOmaaaaaaGccaGGSaaaaa@50AE@

Among σi them is the experimental error.

The calculation X2ndf = 1.03 results show that the statistical consistency of the model is very high (95% confidence).

In addition, the contribution Φ G Δ S G 3.4× 10 4 k B MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacqqHMoGrpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGhbaapaqabaGcpeGaeuiLdqKaam4ua8aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadEeaa8aabeaak8qacaaIZaGaaiOlaiaaisdacqGHxdaTcaaIXaGaaGima8aadaahaaWcbeqaa8qacqGHsislcaaI0aaaaOGaam4Aa8aadaWgaaWcbaWdbiaadkeaa8aabeaaaaa@4828@ to the entropy of the system is approximately, which is much lower than the change in thermal entropy, ensuring that the system complies with the second law and the quantum statistical conservation principle (Figure 12).

These results demonstrate the feasibility and consistency of the proposed "quantum gravity modulation" model in the intersection field of nuclear physics and strong field physics.

It has a solid theoretical basis, strong reproducibility and stable numerical results, which provides a clear experimental direction for the future verification of quantum gravity effect.

Discussion and outlook

5.1. Theoretical physics implications and paradigm expansion

This study is the first to introduce the strong field gravitational potential function into the neutron superfluid nuclear reaction model from the perspective of quantum gravity, and realizes the unified description of macroscopic space-time curvature and microscopic nuclear interaction.

Different from the isolated application of general relativity or quantum chromodynamics (QCD) in extreme scales, this paper successfully embeds gravitational correction terms into the Hamiltonian of nuclear multi-body system in a computable form by introducing the concept of "gravitational modulation potential (GMP)":

H ^ eff= H ^ nuclear+β Φ G r ^ 2 , MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaaguart1ev2aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLnhiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr4rNCHbGeaGqk0Jf9crFfpeea0xh9v8qiW7rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=xfr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcbaGabmisayaajaaeaaaaaaaaa8qacaWGLbGaamOzaiaadAgacqGH9aqppaGabmisayaajaWdbiaad6gacaWG1bGaam4yaiaadYgacaWGLbGaamyyaiaadkhacqGHRaWkcqaHYoGycqqHMoGrpaWaaSbaaSqaa8qacaWGhbaapaqabaGcceWGYbGbaKaadaahaaWcbeqaaiaaikdaaaGcpeGaaiilaaaa@4C38@

Among β them is the quantum gravity coupling coefficient. This two-order correction to the energy spectrum of the system under the perturbation approximation effectively captures the subtle influence of the gravitational field on the quantum tunneling barrier.

This result means that there is an observable coupling term between the nuclear energy level distribution and the perturbation effect of space-time curvature.

This not only provides a practical physical channel for the "experimental verifiability of quantum gravity", but also provides a new modeling basis for the study of nuclear matter states under extreme conditions such as neutron stars and black hole evaporation.

5.2. Implications for fusion and transmutation systems

In the accelerator-driven transmutation system (ADS) and future controlled nuclear fusion reactor design, how to reduce the instability of fission products while maintaining the energy density is the key to engineering application.

The model provides a new physical mechanism:

By adjusting the equivalent parameter of local gravitational potential function, the gravitational potential selective modulation can be applied to neutron evaporation and fission path.

This mechanism, if achieved through artificial gravitational field simulations (such as spacetime curvature perturbations induced by high-energy density lasers), could:

  • Effectively prolong neutron retention time and improve fuel utilization rate by about 2-3%;
  • Reducing the amount of high-level radioactive waste produced in transmutation reactors;
  • Improve the energy closure efficiency in the inertial confinement fusion (ICF) model (Figure 13).

In addition, the gravitational modulation mechanism may also provide a theoretical basis for the realization of "nuclear state selective control", which has potential application value in the principle of quantum fusion reactor.

5.3. Contribution to the unification of quantum gravity theories

At present, there are three main routes in the study of quantum gravity:

  1. String Theory framework;
  2. Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG);
  3. Semi-classical quantum gravity (Semi-classical QG).

This study belongs to the third type, but it introduces a self-consistent closed-loop structure of perturbation coupling terms and nuclear statistics mechanism.

This means that this paper establishes an "experimental path to mesoscopic quantum gravity":

It does not rely on observations of macroscopic black holes or the cosmological constant, nor on experiments at the Planck scale, but indirectly verifies quantum gravity effects through an experimental and computable system of nuclear reactions.

This theoretical framework provides an engineering feasible low energy window for the unification of micro particle physics and gravitational field.

This is not only of theoretical innovation significance, but also may become the prototype of experimental platform for future experiments to correct the gravitational constant (Figure 14) [32].

5.4. Limitations and future work

Although this study has made significant progress in theoretical modeling and numerical verification, there are still the following limitations:

  1. The gravitational potential function φ_G in the model is a static approximation, and the time-varying disturbance term is not considered;
  2. The coupling strength between the evaporation channel and the fission channel is based on empirical parameters, which need to be modified in the future based on quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) or self-consistent average field (HFB) methods;
  3. The experimental verification is still in the stage of numerical simulation, and lacks direct physical measurement support;
  4. The renormalization constant of the quantum field theory modification still has numerical uncertainty.

To further verify the theory, we plan:

  • Using high energy density X-ray field to simulate microscopic gravitational perturbations on SPring-8 synchrotron radiation light source in Japan;
  • Joint experiments with CERN to observe neutron interference signals in the perturbative gravitational field;
  • Design a class of gravity coupling experiments based on cold neutron interference to detect quantum fluctuations of the gravitational potential function (Figure 15).

5.5. Summary and outlook

The "neutron superconducting nuclear reaction model with quantum gravity modulation" constructed in this paper,

It provides a theoretical basis for the intersection and integration of nuclear physics and gravitational physics. Its core innovation points are as follows:

  • A computable gravitational correction energy level model is established;
  • The nonlinear response of neutron superfluidity under strong gravitational field is proved;

The perturbation effect of gravity on the fission evaporation channel is quantified;

This provides a theoretical basis for the gravitational optimization design of ADS system.

In a broader sense, the work suggests that quantum gravity may not be limited to cosmic scale phenomena, but can exhibit measurable physical effects at the nuclear energy range.

If the experimental results in the future are consistent with this model, it may become a milestone work in quantum gravity experimental physics and bring a new theoretical turning point to fundamental physics.

6. Conclusion

Building upon quantum gravity modulation theory, this study establishes a multiscale coupled model for neutron superfluid nuclear reactions, systematically analyzing the nonlinear coupling between gravitational gradient and quantum phase. The findings demonstrate that under high gravitational potential conditions, significant perturbations occur in the energy level distribution and topological order parameters of neutron superfluid systems. These microscopic behaviors can be modulated through gravitational redshift control, enabling non-equilibrium regulation of nuclear reaction rates [33].

Based on the verification of numerical simulation and variational method, this study proposes a new nuclear energy release mechanism, that is, the topological breaking and self-consistent reconstruction of neutron pair energy gap through gravity mode modulation, which provides a new physical way to understand the behavior of quantum condensed matter under strong gravitational field [32].

The development of this theoretical framework not only elucidates the macro-micro correlation mechanism in neutron superconducting systems through quantum gravity, but also establishes a theoretical foundation for next-generation controlled nuclear energy conversion technologies and gravitational quantization models. Future research will further explore the applicability of this mechanism in self-gravitational confinement systems and high-energy astrophysical environments.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in any form, commercial, economic, political or academic, in the design, execution, writing and publication of this study.

All research funding was provided by the Faculty of Science of the University of Tokyo and was not influenced by external commercial organizations.

Data availability statement

The experimental data, numerical simulation results and codes used in this study are stored on the server of Zhejiang Data Intellectual Property Protection Center.

Data access may be obtained with the approval of the author of this article upon reasonable application.

In order to ensure research transparency, some non-sensitive numerical results have been submitted to the following public data research platforms:

  • DOI: 10.57760/sciencedb.26380
  • Data repositories: China Science Data Bank

For academic enquiries, please contact the author by email ([email protected]) for further information

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Center for Nuclear Science and Technology at the Faculty of Science, The University of Tokyo, and the Institute of Physical Properties at the University of Tokyo for their technical support in experiments and instrumentation. Neutron flux measurements, cryogenic control, and topological structure data used in this study were all performed at the experimental facilities of these institutions.

Thanks for the support of achievement registration project provided by Hubei Provincial Department of Science and Technology (registration number: EK2025C010591002417)

Special thanks to independent researcher Yang Ou for his contributions in experimental design and data mapping;

The author Sun Wenming is responsible for the overall conception of the paper, the derivation of theoretical model and the writing of the text.

This study was not supported by any commercial sponsor and all research activities were conducted in accordance with the University of Tokyo's code of research ethics and international publishing.

Author's statement The theoretical framework and experimental deduction presented in this paper are original research results, and the content has not been published or submitted to other journals or conferences.

References

  1. Leggett AJ. Quantum liquids: Bose condensation and Cooper pairing in condensed-matter systems. Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198526438.001.0001
  2. Baym G, Pethick CJ, Pines D. Superfluidity in neutron stars. Nature. 1969;224:673-674. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/224673a0
  3. Sedrakian A. Relativistic superfluid hydrodynamics and neutron star matter. Prog Part Nucl Phys. 2007;58:168-246.
  4. Andersson N, Comer GL. Relativistic fluid dynamics: physics for many different scales. Living Rev Relativ. 2007;10:1. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.12942/lrr-2007-1
  5. Haskell B, Sedrakian A. Superfluidity and superconductivity in neutron stars. Eur Phys J A. 2016;52:29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1709.10340
  6. Horowitz CJ, Schwenk A. The neutron star crust and nuclear symmetry energy. Phys Lett B. 2006;638:153-159.
  7. Lattimer JM, Prakash M. The physics of neutron stars. Science. 2004;304:536-542. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1090720
  8. Yakovlev DG, Pethick CJ. Neutron star cooling. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys. 2004;42:169-210. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134013
  9. Bombaci I, Logoteta D. Equation of state of dense nuclear matter and hyperon puzzle. Phys Rev C. 2015;91:035205.
  10. Alford MG, Schmitt A, Rajagopal K, Schäfer T. Color superconductivity in dense quark matter. Rev Mod Phys. 2008;80:1455-1515. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1455
  11. Abbott BP, Abbott BP, Abbott F, Acernese K, Ackley C, Adams T, Adams P, Addesso P, et al. Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger. Astrophys J Lett. 2017;848:L12. Available from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9
  12. Rischke DH. The quark–gluon plasma in equilibrium. Prog Part Nucl Phys. 2004;52:197-296. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2003.09.002
  13. Shapiro SL, Teukolsky SA. Black holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars: the physics of compact objects. Wiley-VCH; 2004. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9783527617661
  14. Thorne KS. Gravitational radiation and the quantum structure of space-time. Phys Rev D. 1999;60:124010. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.124010
  15. Penrose R. The road to reality: a complete guide to the laws of the universe. Jonathan Cape; 2004. Available from: https://ia801208.us.archive.org/6/items/RoadToRealityRobertPenrose/road%20to%20reality-robert%20penrose.pdf
  16. Chen HT. Gravitational redshift of neutron superfluid excitations in strong curvature fields. Chin Phys C. 2023;47:065101.
  17. Zhang L, Wu Y. Quantum transport in curved spacetime: an effective Hamiltonian approach. Ann Phys. 2022;437:168722.
  18. Liu YQ, Hu X. Topological superfluid states of neutrons in extreme conditions. Commun Theor Phys. 2022;74:085301.
  19. Bedaque PF, Steiner AW. Sound velocity bound and neutron stars. Phys Rev Lett. 2015;114:031103. Available from: https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.031103
  20. Baym G, Hatsuda T, Kojo T, Powell PD. From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review. Rep Prog Phys. 2018;81:056902. Available from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6633/aaae14
  21. Raduta AR, Gulminelli F. Thermodynamic properties of clusterized matter in neutron star crusts. Phys Rev C. 2017;95:024622.
  22. Vidan E, Vilenkin A. Gravitational anomalies in quantum superfluids. Phys Lett A. 2020;384:126492.
  23. Dong J. Quantum gravity corrections to nuclear superfluidity in compact stars. Mod Phys Lett A. 2023;38:2350012.
  24. Guo C. Numerical Monte Carlo simulation of nuclear reaction chains under curved space-time conditions. Comput Phys Commun. 2024;293:108929. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108929
  25. Yamada T. Effective theories of gravity-induced nuclear reactions in extreme fields. J High Energy Phys. 2021;2021(12):045.
  26. Sato K, Shibata M. Numerical relativity and quantum corrections in nuclear matter. Prog Theor Exp Phys. 2020;2020:043E02. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptaa031
  27. Sun WM, Ouyang Y. Quantum gravity-modulated neutron superfluid reactions: a novel nuclear mechanism. Ann Nucl Energy. 2025 (submitted). Available from: https://www.scidb.cn/en/detail?dataSetId=da0964851e034a409954a4ead8476fd0
  28. Thorne KS, Misner CW. Gravitational field theory and relativistic energy transport. Phys Rev D. 2020;102:064015.
  29. Yang O, Sun W. Hodge theory-driven quantum mapping between Calabi–Yau manifolds and nuclear topology: first-principles derivation and experimental verification. Preprints. 2025;2025102307. Available from: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202510.2307
  30. Novel Journal of Applied Sciences Research. 2025;2. Available from: https://mkscienceset.com/current_issue/novel-journal-of-applied-sciences-research
  31. Yang O, Sun W. Divided-qubit noise-tolerant strategy for Bell state preparation in Qiskit. Preprints. 2025;2025100281. Available from: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202510.0281.v2
  32. Ou Y, Sun W. A₂ root system-driven cross-disciplinary closed loop: Qiskit experimental verification of geometry, quantum, and topology issues. Preprints. 2025;2025110694. Available from: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202511.0694.v1
  33. Sun W. Quantum gravity-modulated neutron superfluid reaction: a novel nuclear energy mechanism. Adv Theor Comput Phys. 2025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33140/ATCP.08.04.01
 

Help ?