Rayleigh’s, Rician’s and Gaussian’s distributed Noise Modelling for MRI Data, Stability Analysis under Parameters Variation

Main Article Content

Ofer Aluf

Abstract

Last Rayleigh’s, Rician’s, and Gaussian’s distributed noise model is obtained by using negative log likelihood minimizing. In machine learning (ML), we can implement optimization by using minimization of Negative Log Likelihood (NLL). It is maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) used the minimization of Negative Log Likelihood (NLL). The summable log – probabilities come from multiplicative probabilities. The log is used to handle very small likelihoods. The negative log likelihood comes from the need to optimize objective function (cost function or loss function). It is related to Gaussian or Rayleigh or Rician probability density functions. The noise in MRI is very critical and need to be inspected deeply for dynamical behaviour. The model amplitude of a noise – free image (I) is delayed in time due to additional disturbances (interferences). The delay parameters influence the dynamic of the system and need to be chosen for getting stable system. The stability is inspected for best performance. The nonlinear dynamic theory gives the key criteria for stable system. Integral part of the method is to track changes in system variables over time. The system dynamical behaviour can be chaotic, counterintuitive, or unpredictable. We get the specific system parameters criteria for getting disturbances reduction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Aluf, O. (2026). Rayleigh’s, Rician’s and Gaussian’s distributed Noise Modelling for MRI Data, Stability Analysis under Parameters Variation. Annals of Mathematics and Physics, 104–116. https://doi.org/10.17352/amp.000187
Mini Reviews

Copyright (c) 2026 Aluf O

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Yadav, et al. A PDE-based general framework adapted to Rayleigh’s, Rician’s and Gaussian’s distributed noise for restoration and enhancement of MRI. J Med Phys. 2016;41(4). Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5228049/

Awudong B, Yakupu P, Yan J, Li Q. Research and implementation of denoising algorithm for brain MRIs via morphological component analysis and adaptive threshold estimation. Mathematics. 2024;12(5):748. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Research-and-Implementation-of-Denoising-Algorithm-Awudong-Yakupu/113121a223890d303a7a3d5bd8c398353fc0b2b6

Turitsyn SK, Prilepsky JE, Le ST, Wahls S, Frumin LL, Kamalian M, et al. Nonlinear Fourier transforms for optical data processing and transmission: advances and perspectives. Optica. 2017;4(3):307-322. Available from: https://opg.optica.org/optica/fulltext.cfm?uri=optica-4-3-307

Takata S. Linear system identification of 1-DOF vibratory system based on the maximum likelihood estimation using the analytical solution of Fokker-Planck equation. J Mech Elect Intel Syst. 2020;3(2). Available from: https://jmeis.e-jikei.org/issue/archives/0302/JMEIS030203.pdf

Maus M, Cotlet M, Hofkens J, Gensch T, De Schryver FC. An experimental comparison of the maximum likelihood estimation and nonlinear least-squares fluorescence lifetime analysis of single molecules. Anal Chem. 2001 May 1;73(9):2078-2086. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/ac000877g

Schoukens J, Pintelon R, Renneboog J. Maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of linear systems. Period Polytech Electr Eng. 1989;33(4):165-182. Available from: https://pp.bme.hu/ee/article/view/4596

Thibault P, Guizar-Sicairos M. Maximum-likelihood refinement for coherent diffractive imaging. New J Phys. 2012;14:063004. Available from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/14/6/063004

Swevers J, Ganseman C, Tükel DB, De Schutter J, Van Brussel H. Optimal robot excitation and identification. IEEE Trans Robot Autom. 1997;13(5). Available from: https://scispace.com/pdf/optimal-robot-excitation-and-identification-51emb5cq0u.pdf

Marelli D, Fu M, Ninness B. Asymptotic optimality of the maximum-likelihood Kalman filter for Bayesian tracking with multiple nonlinear sensors. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2015;63(17). Available from: https://www.eng.newcastle.edu.au/~mf140/home/Papers/TSP_2015_2.pdf

Liu Z, Wang Y, Cheng Y, Saeed T, Ye Y. Option pricing using stochastic volatility model under Fourier transform of nonlinear differential equation. Open Access Fractals. 2022;30(2):224006. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/fracta/v30y2022i02ns0218348x22400655.html

Lin Q, Ran T, Siyong Z, Yue W. Detection and parameter estimation of multicomponent LFM signal based on the fractional Fourier transform. Sci China Ser F Inf Sci. 2004;47(2):184-198. Available from: https://www.sciengine.com/doi/10.1360/02yf0456

Maggio GN, Hueda MR, Agazzi OE. Maximum likelihood sequence detection receivers for nonlinear optical channels. J Electr Comput Eng. 2015;2015:736267. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2015/736267

Soltani Bozchalooi I, Liang M. Parameter-free bearing fault detection based on maximum likelihood estimation and differentiation. Meas Sci Technol. 2009;20:065102. Available from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0957-0233/20/6/065102

Li J, Liu X, Ren Y, Huang Z. Single-FFT receiver with pairwise maximum likelihood for layered ACO-OFDM. IEEE Photonics J. 2021;13(4). Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=9516997

Bialkowski SE. Overcoming the multiplex disadvantage by using maximum-likelihood inversion. Appl Spectrosc. 1998;52(4). Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1366/0003702981943923

Dai X, Zou R, An J, Li X, Sun S, Wang Y. Reducing the complexity of quasi-maximum-likelihood detectors through companding for coded MIMO systems. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2012;61(3). Available from: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ITVT...61.1109D/abstract

Attaran B, Ghanbarzadeh A. Bearing fault detection based on maximum likelihood estimation and optimized ANN using the bees algorithm. J Appl Comput Mech. 2015;1(1):35-43. Available from: https://jacm.scu.ac.ir/article_10547_0.html

Gustafsson MG, Stepinski T. Studies of split spectrum processing, optimal detection, and maximum likelihood amplitude estimation using a simple clutter model. Ultrasonics. 1997;35:31-52. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041624X96000844?__cf_chl_rt_tk=Cr4ySmmWS60n51pbjsa4Yc683i6yPHTwPA5bqQxLrz4-1779341368-1.0.1.1-ATZWQ3kZOuEVe534a0cWhNPEBwiA_md8KQwLqlmxbTY

Muller SP, Kijewski MF, Moore SC, Holman BL. Maximum-likelihood estimation: a mathematical model for quantitation in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 1990;31(10). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2213195/

Alić N, Papen GC, Saperstein RE, Milstein LB, Fainman Y. Signal statistics and maximum likelihood sequence estimation in intensity modulated fiber optic links containing a single optical preamplifier. Opt Express. 2005;13(12). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19495371/

Odstrcil M, Menzel A, Guizar-Sicairos M. Iterative least-squares solver for generalized maximum-likelihood ptychography. Opt Express. 2018;26(3). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.26.003108

Tong L, Perreau S. Multichannel blind identification: from subspace to maximum likelihood methods. Proc IEEE. 1998;86(10). Available from: https://acsp.ece.cornell.edu/papers/TongPerreau.pdf

Byrne CL, Fitzgerald RM. Spectral estimators that extend the maximum entropy and maximum likelihood methods. SIAM J Appl Math. 1984;44(2). Available from: https://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/0144028

Fatone L, Mariani F, Recchioni MC, Zirilli F. Maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of a system of stochastic differential equations that models the returns of the index of some classes of hedge funds. J Inverse Ill Posed Probl. 2007;15:493-526. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=401050

Akaike H. Maximum likelihood identification of Gaussian autoregressive moving average models. Biometrika. 1973;60(2):255. Available from: https://sites.stat.washington.edu/courses/stat527/s14/readings/biometrika1979.pdf

Kim D, Na B, Kwon SJ, Lee D, Kang W, Moon IC. Maximum likelihood training of implicit nonlinear diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). 2022. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.13699

Strogatz SH. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2024. Available from: https://www.biodyn.ro/course/literatura/Nonlinear_Dynamics_and_Chaos_2018_Steven_H._Strogatz.pdf

Beretta E, Kuang Y. Geometric stability switch criteria in delay differential systems with delay dependent parameters. SIAM J Math Anal. 2002;33(5):1144-1165. Available from: https://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/S0036141000376086

Kuang Y. Delay Differential Equations: With Applications in Population Dynamics. San Diego: Academic Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/243764052_Delay_Differential_Equation_with_Application_in_Population_Dynamics

Gopalsamy K. Stability and Oscillations in Delay Differential Equations of Population Dynamics. New York (NY): Springer; 1992. Available from: https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Stability_and_Oscillations_in_Delay_Diff.html?id=BXbK_T_PSdwC&redir_esc=y