The Constant C and Local Stability in Goldbach’s Conjecture

Main Article Content

Bahbouhi Bouchaib

Abstract

Goldbach’s conjecture has traditionally been approached through global additive methods and density arguments on the prime numbers. In this work, we propose a different perspective based on local stability near the midpoint of even integers. We introduce the notion of invariant logarithmic-square windows centred at E/2 and show that the existence of symmetric prime pairs is governed by a single local parameter measuring midpoint instability. A key contribution is the identification of a split-window mechanism, which demonstrates that large prime gaps at the midpoint do not obstruct symmetry: when the midpoint lies inside a prime desert, the invariant window divides into two equal sub windows on either side, preserving additive structure. This eliminates the classical midpoint-gap objection to Goldbach’s conjecture. We prove that Goldbach’s conjecture for sufficiently large even integers is logically equivalent to a localized, translation-invariant analogue of Bertrand’s postulate at logarithmic-square scale. This reduction isolates a single analytic inequality as the only remaining obstacle to an absolute proof. While this inequality is supported by extensive numerical evidence and heuristic models, it is not currently derivable from known theorems. The results reframe Goldbach’s conjecture as a corollary of a deeper local stability principle governing the prime population and precisely locate the frontier separating structural understanding from analytic proof.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Bouchaib, B. (2026). The Constant C and Local Stability in Goldbach’s Conjecture. Annals of Mathematics and Physics, 027–033. https://doi.org/10.17352/amp.000176
Review Articles

Copyright (c) 2026 Bahbouhi B.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Goldbach C. Letter to Leonhard Euler, June 7, 1742. In: Correspondence between Goldbach and Euler. 1742. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldbach%27s_conjecture

Euler L. Letter to Christian Goldbach, June 30, 1742. In: Opera Omnia. Series IV, Vol A. 1742.

Hardy GH, Littlewood JE. Some problems of partitio numerorum; III: on the expression of a number as a sum of primes. Acta Math. 1923;44:1-70. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02403921

Vinogradov IM. Representation of an odd number as a sum of three primes. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR. 1937;15:169-172.

Chen JR. On the representation of a large even integer as the sum of a prime and the product of at most two primes. Sci Sin. 1973;16:157-176. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=4022521

Ramaré O. On Šnirel’man’s constant. Ann Sc Norm Super Pisa. 1995;22:645-706. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284772610_On_Snirel'man's_constant

Kaczorowski J, Perelli A. On the exceptional set in Goldbach’s problem. J Number Theory. 2011;131:118-134.

Cramér H. On the order of magnitude of the difference between consecutive prime numbers. Acta Arith. 1936;2:23-46.

Granville A. Harald Cramér and the distribution of prime numbers. Scand Actuar J. 1995;1:12-28. Available from: https://chance.dartmouth.edu/chance_news/for_chance_news/Riemann/cramer.pdf

Baker RC, Harman G, Pintz J. The difference between consecutive primes, II. Proc Lond Math Soc. 2001;83:532-562. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/83.3.532?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate.net%26utm_medium%3Darticle

Maynard J. Small gaps between primes. Ann Math. 2015;181:383-413. Available from: https://annals.math.princeton.edu/2015/181-1/p07

Ford K, Green B, Konyagin S, Maynard J, Tao T. Large gaps between consecutive prime numbers. Ann Math. 2016;183:935-974. Available from: https://annals.math.princeton.edu/wp-content/uploads/annals-v183-n3-p04-p.pdf

Tao T. Bounded gaps between primes. Curr Dev Math. 2014;2014:1-26.

Dusart P. Estimates of some functions over primes without R.H. arXiv preprint. 2010. arXiv:1002.0442. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.0442

Montgomery HL, Vaughan RC. Multiplicative number theory I: classical theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.

Ivić A. The Riemann zeta-function. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1985. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1935243

Soundararajan K. Small gaps between prime numbers: the work of Goldston–Pintz–Yıldırım. Bull Am Math Soc. 2007;44:1-18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273-0979-06-01142-6

Granville A, Soundararajan K. The distribution of values of L(1, χ_d). Geom Funct Anal. 2003;13:992-1028. Available from: https://backend.production.deepblue-documents.lib.umich.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/20524c90-9ece-4d68-afe1-3c44d0a69d6f/content

Tenenbaum G. Introduction to analytic and probabilistic number theory. 3rd ed. Providence (RI): American Mathematical Society; 2015. Available from: https://bookstore.ams.org/view?ProductCode=GSM/163

Bahbouhi B. The unified prime equation and the Z constant: a constructive path toward the Riemann hypothesis. Comput Intell CS Math. 2025;1(1):1-33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.65157/CICSM.2025.001

Bahbouhi B. A formal proof for Goldbach’s strong conjecture by the unified prime equation and the Z constant. Comput Intell CS Math. 2025;1(1):1-25. Available from: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202510.0662

Bouchaib B. Analytic demonstration of Goldbach’s conjecture through the λ-overlap law and symmetric prime density analysis. J Artif Intell Res Innov. 2025;:59-74. Available from: https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jairi.1001008